Again, while I will add a few ideas to flesh out this post, I am standing on the shoulders of giants. Please read these articles first:
Here's the link to Brian Straus' (@brianstraus) original article: http://aol.it/u7cF43.
Here's the link to Grant Wahls's (@grantwahl) article. http://bit.ly/wahlplayoffs.
Done reading? Ok. Let's plug in some teams!
It would start with Wild Card play-ins, grouped this time by conference (imagine that). In the West, FC Dallas would host Colorado on Wednesday at 8:30pm (World Series issues for another time). In the East, the Columbus Crew would play host to the New York Red Bulls, let's say on Thursday night at 7:30pm. Let's examine the impact on this round.
- Compared to the current format, conference grouping would reduce total travel in this round by 55%, from 2539 miles to 1141 miles. Travel is a major issue during the season, and playoffs will be no different. Still, reducing unnecessary travel would be a good start.
- While Dallas still hosts and New York still travels, Columbus (47 pts on the season) would now host a home playoff match instead of Colorado (49 pts). While it's nice to reward the team with the better season-long record, I'd say if you're 5th in your conference you don't have a lot of griping room. Just be happy to be in the playoffs.
Group A: LA Galaxy, Houston Dynamo, Philadelphia Union, FC Dallas
Under Brian's plan Group A would include West #1 (Galaxy), East #2 (Dynamo), East #3 (Philly) & West #4 (FCD). LA Galaxy is rewarded for winning their conference by hosting 3 playoff matches. Philly would host Houston & FCD, and Philly would host FCD. FC Dallas, being the wild card team, faces 3 road matches in their group. However, with a few good results they could still advance to the MLS (not conference) Semi-Finals; the top 2 in each group move on.
Group B: Sporting KC, Seattle Sounders, Real Salt Lake, Columbus Crew
In Group B, Sporting KC would host Seattle, RSL & The Crew. Home/Away matches are handled just like in group A, with The Crew traveling to all 3 opponent's venues. Quite the gauntlet - LiveStrong Park, CenturyLink & Rio Tinto!
In terms of game sequence, I would have the 1-4 match played first, followed by the 1-3 and 1-2 matches. This gives the #1 seed the benefit of the (on paper) easier opponents earlier and possibly guaranteeing passage into the Semis sooner. This would mean game schedules might look like this:
| Round 1: Saturday, 10/29 |
|
| Columbus Crew @ Sporting KC | 8:00pm EST |
| Real Salt Lake @ Sounders FC | 10:00pm EST |
| Round 1: Sunday, 10/30 |
|
| Philadelphia Union @ Houston Dynamo | 8:00pm EST |
| FC Dallas @ LA Galaxy | 10:00pm EST |
| Round 2: Wednesday, 11/2 |
|
| FC Dallas @ Houston Dynamo | 6:00pm EST |
| Columbus Crew @ Sounders FC | 8:00pm EST |
| Real Salt Lake @ Sporting KC | 8:00pm EST |
| Philadelphia Union @ LA Galaxy | 10:00pm EST |
| Round 3: Saturday, 11/5 |
|
| FC Dallas @ Philadelphia Union | 8:00pm EST |
| Columbus Crew @ Real Salt Lake | 10:00pm EST |
| Round 3: Sunday, 11/6 |
|
| Sounders FC @ Sporting KC | 6:00pm EST |
| Houston Dynamo @ LA Galaxy | 8:00pm EST |
Now, let's break it down, round by round.
Round 1 - Since there are 3 matches guaranteed for each team, one hiccup doesn't cost a quality team their entire season. Games in this round would have urgency, especially since the away team knows that life isn't getting that much easier; the time to press is now, when they're freshest.
Round 2 - The midweek match is really where the pressure hits. All matches would be played on Wednesday, which would cram the TV schedule a bit. No one complains about this during March Madness, and I actually think it would be fantastic to have overlapping playoff matches in this round. It would also help to focus media/hype to one day midweek, as opposed to trying to get the public to remember which teams played on which days. Just my theory, but I think it would help.
Round 3 - Obviously, this is the make or break round. It would be held over the 2nd weekend of the playoffs, with a well-deserved week long break awaiting Semi-Finalists. As happens in the group stage, some teams will likely be eliminated by this point, while others may have already clinched a berth in the Semis.
For our purposes, let's say those emerging from MLS Madness are: 1) LA Galaxy & 2) Philadelphia Union from Group A, 1) Sounders FC & 2) Columbus Crew from Group B (hey, it's my fantasy). I would favor a 2-game aggregate series, with of course A1 vs B2 and B1 vs A2. No extra benefit would be given for away goals. This does a few key things:
- It "earns" each Semi-Finalist a home playoff match. In the case of the Wild Cards, this could be their first and only home playoff match. If a team went from a 5th seeded Wild Card on to win their road WC match, then get out of their group, they deserve to reward themselves and their fans with a home playoff match.
- Balances the home/away field time. No team should win a soccer title with home-field advantage in every single match (looking at YOU, SSFC).
- Does not penalize a team for hosting a high-scoring match (away goal rule not in effect). Maybe it's just me, but I think some games turn out high scoring and others don't. Why should it matter which one you hosted? And if away goals was so important to the beautiful game, why aren't they emphasized during the regular season? I'm not a fan of arbitrarily bringing in new rules just b/c it's playoffs.
All this means that in our 2011 MLS Semi-Finals, LA would face Columbus & Seattle would take on Philly. Here's a question - what if the A1 seed had a lower season point total than the B2 seed? Basically, do you re-seed at this stage, which would change where the 2nd (and more advantageous) match was hosted? I would advocate not to re-seed. It's less confusing, and would allow the organizations and cities to better prepare for possible upcoming matches. That said, we would have:
| MLS Semi-Finals: Leg 1 Saturday, 11/12 |
|
| LA Galaxy @ Columbus Crew | 8:00pm EST |
| Philadelphia Union @ Sounders FC | 10:00pm EST |
| MLS Semi-Finals: Leg 2 Sunday, 11/19 |
|
| Sounders FC @ Philadelphia Union | 6:00pm EST |
| Columbus Crew @ LA Galaxy | 8:00pm EST |
The debate on whether MLS Cup should be a 1-game neutral, 1-game at the higher seed's site or 2-game aggregate can be held at another time. At this stage in the game, I'd lean towards a 1-game match at the higher seed's home site. Yes, that means it could be freezing for the MLS Cup, but the Revs, TFC & Vancouver don't look like they're testing that theory anytime soon. I would love to see supporters rewarded with a home match to potentially win the whole thing. I was at MLS Cup '08 when the Crew won, and while I was euphoric & there were hundreds of Crew fans at the HDC, it would have been even more magical in Columbus Crew Stadium.
Ok, that's it! So, this is all good for 2012, right? No matter what you think, there's one thing we can all agree on: at least this championship is settled on the field, without computer polls or strength of schedule affecting anything.

